70-200 F2.8 or 100-400?

View the Latest Sony Lens Deals At: B&H Photo

russellsnr

Well Known Member
Followers
1
Following
0
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
135
Likes Received
286
Name
Russell Webb (snr)
Hi, 200-600mm I use it in hide on a Tripod/Gimbal and walking around but lately as now reaching 70 I find it does get heavy, I have the 70-200 F4 but sometime that is not enough reach and does not work with the 1.4 extender so was looking at the 70-200 GM but then need the TC so really gain not a lot in weight loss except in my bank A/C plus would then need the 1.4 extender and loose light,
So my question is although F5.6 against F2.8 is the 100-400 a better option?
The Pros I can see is (1) slightly cheaper (2) slightly more distance against 200 with the 1.4 (3) Internal Zoom (4) Not a great difference in weight.
Cons -2 Stops less light.
Thanks
Russ.
 
It depends what your main subjects are! Given the 200-600 is f5.6 to f6.3 and you are used to this I would image the 100-400 at f5.6 would be fine. I have all 3, the 100-400 is phenomenally sharp at 400 wide open and very good with TC's. I've only just bought the 70-200 so haven't had time to compare it using the 2x TC yet. Reviews seem to say the 100 - 400 is better than the 70-200 with TC. I'd go 100-400.
 
Thankyou for the replies, most images I take are small birds either from my hide or walking around.
Russ.
 
I don't think anyone has truly regrated buying the 100-400GM. The short minimal focusing distance, the general focal range and the sharpness makes it a killer lens.
 
Thankyou for the replies, most images I take are small birds either from my hide or walking around.
Russ.
Russ I only got the 100-400 in October last year for a trip but this lens is super sharp only used a few times but happy with it
robin 11.10.22 (15).jpg
  • ILCE-9
  • Sony FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS (SEL100400GM)
  • 400.0 mm
  • ƒ/5.6
  • 1/2000 sec
  • ISO 5000
oriental hornet greece 2022.jpg
  • ILCE-9
  • Sony FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS (SEL100400GM)
  • 400.0 mm
  • ƒ/10
  • 1/2000 sec
  • ISO 1000
 
I have the 200-600mm and the 100-400mm and the one I use the most is the 100-400mm. It rapidly became one of my favorite lenses as it is so versatile and I can carry and handhold it wherever I want to go to explore photo opportunities. The 200-600mm is an excellent lens, too, but it is too heavy and unwieldy for me, a petite woman, to try to tote around anywhere, and it is best used on the tripod. I now have my eye on the new 70-200mm GM II, but haven't made that purchase yet. The 200-600mm and 100-400mm both work quite nicely with a Sony 1.4x TC, too, and I find that very useful from time to time. I've never bothered even thinking about putting a 2X TC on either of them, as there would be just too much light loss. I can see, though, how a TC, either 1.4x or 2X, could be very, very useful on the new 70-200mm f/2.8 GM II.

If and when I do buy the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM II, I probably would do the same as Landshark 99 and not bother putting any TC on it, since the longer range is already covered by my other lenses.
 

View the Latest Sony Lens Deals At: B&H Photo

Back
Top