Reply to thread

Ok, so this is the problem with the average person not realising just how monopolised this control system is. 99.9% of people who are suspicious will just skim the absolute surface then come to their conclusion.

Example, Bill Gates is giving almost all of his wealth to charities when he passes. On the surface this seems fantastic, then once you dig into the history of each charity and the history of the chief members of each charity it becomes coincidence after coincidence. Long histories of connections to media, government, education, medical etc.

In regards to Wikipedia, generally a simple Google search then a headline read of the top 3 or 4 searches will be enough for most people to believe it's all good. Media and public information companies are displayed as independent, but a proper dig into it will prove that those in charge and those who are funding it are all connected at the grass roots. In the mainstream arena there is literally zero sources that are not ultimately controlled by the same small group of people. It's as simple as going on their sites and chasing up the information they display on there, it is not hidden at all so long as you have both eyes open. The people have absolutely no idea just how censored and miscontrued the world actually is...