dragonfly with 200-600 + 1.4 test shots

spudhead

Legendary Member
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Followers
14
Following
0
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Posts
3,401
Likes Received
5,629
Name
Gary
Country
United Kingdom
one from earlier this year while testing 200-600 and 1.4 for close up shots this is one only of a number of test shots
dragonfly 2023 37.jpg
  • ILCE-9
  • Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
  • 840.0 mm
  • ƒ/16
  • 1/1600 sec
  • ISO 4000
dragonfly 2023 38.jpg
  • ILCE-9
  • Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
  • 840.0 mm
  • ƒ/16
  • 1/1600 sec
  • ISO 4000
 
I am thinking for static insects the a7r5 70-200mm f4 with 1.4 or 2 tc will give a good account of itself and will show a lot more detail with the option of a focus stack as well as insect ai,as we know insects become awfully big if not on the correct focal plane ,as you can see the body is in focus but head is just wandering out of focus ,still good images with a wonderfully diffused back ground ,just out interest where did you place the focus point ?
 
I am thinking for static insects the a7r5 70-200mm f4 with 1.4 or 2 tc will give a good account of itself and will show a lot more detail with the option of a focus stack as well as insect ai,as we know insects become awfully big if not on the correct focal plane ,as you can see the body is in focus but head is just wandering out of focus ,still good images with a wonderfully diffused back ground ,just out interest where did you place the focus point ?
Paul focus point was on the body behind the head, and I purposely pushed the f number to see what the 1.4 x could do, I loaned a 2x but I think the 1.4 is better at least on the 200-600. I think Sony are well overdue on new teleconverters for e-mount
 
Very nice. Everyone who knows my shots here knows always use the 200 600 for these shots. Plenty of evidence of how good it is.
 
Back
Top