Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Absolutely NOT trading the 300 for the 100-300, for me.The 300 GM works superbly with the 2x TC. None of the Sony zooms works as well (OK, I have only tested 3 of the 4 - I don’t have the 100-400).Besides, I would expect the 100-300 to be significantly heavier.I would expect it to work with TCs.Sony has not released any lenses with an integral TC. They might, but their track record says no.The price is an interesting question. I can see it two ways:If they make it as sharp and fast as the 300GM, you could argue that it must cost more with the extra flexibilityNone of their white zooms cost near the price of the ultimate quality white primes, so it must cost lessI don’t know how much the Canon or Nikon versions are.Would I buy it? Hard to say. I really like the 300 GM. Would depend a lot on its price and weight, and a bit on image quality.If it weighed like the Canon, heck no!If it cost like the 400 GM, noIf it cost like the 200-600, possibly yesGuess I will have to wait and see.
Absolutely NOT trading the 300 for the 100-300, for me.
The 300 GM works superbly with the 2x TC. None of the Sony zooms works as well (OK, I have only tested 3 of the 4 - I don’t have the 100-400).
Besides, I would expect the 100-300 to be significantly heavier.
I would expect it to work with TCs.
Sony has not released any lenses with an integral TC. They might, but their track record says no.
The price is an interesting question. I can see it two ways:
I don’t know how much the Canon or Nikon versions are.
Would I buy it? Hard to say. I really like the 300 GM. Would depend a lot on its price and weight, and a bit on image quality.
Guess I will have to wait and see.