sswildlife
Active Member
- Followers
- 1
- Following
- 1
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2025
- Posts
- 35
- Likes Received
- 155
- Trophy Points
- 33
- Name
- Shravan Sundaram
Don't Chew On Me - Endangered San Joaquin Kit Fox kits enjoying a romp outside their den. This is one of my favorite California species, it's always a treat to observe them. They are a highly sensitive species facing various threats including but not limited to mange, habitat loss/fragmentation, and predation by Coyotes, Golden Eagles, etc.
This image was taken at a very long focal length to avoid disturbance to the den. Special thanks to a police officer for kindly sharing this den location with me out of the blue while I was hiking, I would not have found it otherwise.
I was flirting with the idea of picking up a 400-800, but my 200-600 is a very sharp copy and performs well with the 1.4x extender, so I decided against it and instead plan to save that money and wait for a wider aperture wildlife zoom. What are your thoughts on the 400-800mm zoom vs 200-600mm + 1.4x?
Species: San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis)Location: California, USA
Equipment: Sony A9 III + FE 200-600mm + 1.4x Extender, On Tripod
Settings: 1/1600s, ISO: 1250, f/9 @840mm
This image was taken at a very long focal length to avoid disturbance to the den. Special thanks to a police officer for kindly sharing this den location with me out of the blue while I was hiking, I would not have found it otherwise.
I was flirting with the idea of picking up a 400-800, but my 200-600 is a very sharp copy and performs well with the 1.4x extender, so I decided against it and instead plan to save that money and wait for a wider aperture wildlife zoom. What are your thoughts on the 400-800mm zoom vs 200-600mm + 1.4x?
Species: San Joaquin Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis)Location: California, USA
Equipment: Sony A9 III + FE 200-600mm + 1.4x Extender, On Tripod
Settings: 1/1600s, ISO: 1250, f/9 @840mm
- ILCE-9M3
- FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS + 1.4X Teleconverter
- 840.0 mm
- ƒ/9
- 1/1600 sec
- ISO 1250