Needle of Kent

evacguy

Veteran Member
Followers
4
Following
14
Joined
Jan 17, 2023
Posts
1,195
Likes Received
2,620
Name
Ed Galea
Country
United Kingdom
City/State
London
CC Welcome
  1. Yes
StMichael and All Angels looked particularly spectacular today. You can see why she is called the 'Needle of Kent'.
needle_of_kent-5.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 70.0 mm
  • ƒ/20
  • 1/2000 sec
  • ISO 3200
 
Last edited:
Another angle on the 'Needle of Kent' also known as St.Michaels and all Angels with the wonderful magnolia tree across the road. Sometimes I wish I had my 50mm lens with me, or perhaps a 35mm lens?
stmichael-3.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 70.0 mm
  • ƒ/20
  • 1/1250 sec
  • ISO 3200
 
Another angle on the 'Needle of Kent' also known as St.Michaels and all Angels with the wonderful magnolia tree across the road. Sometimes I wish I had my 50mm lens with me, or perhaps a 35mm lens?
View attachment 35560
I like the colors in this [second] one more, pity you couldn't get the whole structure in frame.
 
I like the colors in this [second] one more, pity you couldn't get the whole structure in frame.
I agree, that’s why I wished I had my 50mm lens with me, or a 35mm lens.
 
I agree, that’s why I wished I had my 50mm lens with me, or a 35mm lens.
Not sure how your wallet looks, but the Tamron 28-200 provides some really nice results at a reasonable price, with a very useable range. Great walkabout lens. Another alternative, though not as long, is the 24-105.
 
That 28-200 is above my retirement-pay grade, sad to say - but I watch used prices just in case.
I do have this relatively speedy Σ 28-105 in PK mount, along with their 70-300 Apo from the same pre-DG era; both zoom 'backward' to us non-Canon veterans, but at least they both go the same way! :) I haven't tested them rigorously as I'm more commonly using Pentax primes - but I should. The 70-300 tested pretty well when it arrived, but the 28-105 has a pretty wide range of scores in its web-wide reviews.

That is quite an impressive needle, by the way!
 
A normally obscurred view of St.Michael and All Angels.
stmichaels-1.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 89.0 mm
  • ƒ/22
  • 1/500 sec
  • ISO 3200
 
That 28-200 is above my retirement-pay grade, sad to say - but I watch used prices just in case.
I do have this relatively speedy Σ 28-105 in PK mount, along with their 70-300 Apo from the same pre-DG era; both zoom 'backward' to us non-Canon veterans, but at least they both go the same way! :) I haven't tested them rigorously as I'm more commonly using Pentax primes - but I should. The 70-300 tested pretty well when it arrived, but the 28-105 has a pretty wide range of scores in its web-wide reviews.

That is quite an impressive needle, by the way!
Jim, I love the GM 70-200mm f2.8 II so not sure I need a 100mm zoom. What I need though is something at the other end of the range, so the 28-200mm could do the job, but it would have to be significantly better than my GM 70-200mm to get me to move. Alternatively, I just need to get something like a 35mm and carry it around with me. But once again, I'm not a big fan of changing lens in the field. I could go for two cameras, but then I'd have to carry two cameras, and I love how my A7iv and 70-200mm is so light! Guess I may have to put up with my A7iv + 70-200mm + Iphone14 Pro.
 
St.Mike, look'n goooooood in April afternoon sunshine.
stmichael_and_all_saints-1.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 94.0 mm
  • ƒ/20
  • 1/100 sec
  • ISO 200
 
St.Michael looking spectuacular on a Spring day.
needle of Kent-1.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 70.0 mm
  • ƒ/22
  • 1/80 sec
  • ISO 200
 
St.Michael and All Angels looking devine as a back drop to the white roses.

stmichael+and_all_angels_ps-5.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 70.0 mm
  • ƒ/22
  • 1/320 sec
  • ISO 100
 
I edited the above image in PS to try and brighten up the church tower and the clouds. I used the dodge tool - still learning how to use this. What do you think, is it an improvement on the above image?
stmichael+and_all_angels_ps2-6.jpg
  • ILCE-7M4
  • FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
  • 70.0 mm
  • ƒ/22
  • 1/320 sec
  • ISO 100
 
I edited the above image in PS to try and brighten up the church tower and the clouds. I used the dodge tool - still learning how to use this. What do you think, is it an improvement on the above image?View attachment 40821
Subtle change, but yes an improvement.
 

New in Marketplace

Back
Top