C cdavidc Newcomer Followers 0 Following 0 Joined Jun 20, 2026 Posts 1 Likes Received 0 Trophy Points 1 Name David Carlson Sunday at 7:29 PM #1 would a person be better off with the A6400 with the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 or the A6700 with the 16-50 kit lens? Both combos would cost about the same
would a person be better off with the A6400 with the Sigma 18-50 f2.8 or the A6700 with the 16-50 kit lens? Both combos would cost about the same
U Unframed Dave Veteran Member Pro Member Pro Member Followers 13 Following 4 Joined Jun 7, 2022 Posts 1,724 Likes Received 2,422 Trophy Points 313 Name Dave Monday at 5:46 AM #2 The obvious answer is that you'd be better off with the 6700 and the sigma. Conventional wisdom is that you should marry the lens and date the camera, so if funds are limited, the first option would be the best. For now, anyway. I don't like the viewfinder on the 6400 at all. Last edited: Monday at 6:18 AM
The obvious answer is that you'd be better off with the 6700 and the sigma. Conventional wisdom is that you should marry the lens and date the camera, so if funds are limited, the first option would be the best. For now, anyway. I don't like the viewfinder on the 6400 at all.
FowlersFreeTime Legendary Member Pro Member Pro Member Followers 40 Following 6 Joined Nov 19, 2020 Posts 3,470 Likes Received 3,337 Trophy Points 313 Name Chris Country United States City/State Pembroke Pines/FL Today at 1:54 AM #3 Get the newer camera if you can. It has a bigger battery, IBIS (where the a6400 doesn't), better autofocus modes, bigger grip and better controls. I upgraded from the A6400 to the A6700 and although the photo resolution is only marginally better, the ergonomics made a world of difference.
Get the newer camera if you can. It has a bigger battery, IBIS (where the a6400 doesn't), better autofocus modes, bigger grip and better controls. I upgraded from the A6400 to the A6700 and although the photo resolution is only marginally better, the ergonomics made a world of difference.