Welcome to Our Alpha Shooters Community Forum

We'd love to welcome you on board, join today!

Rumors Viltrox teleconverters?

FowlersFreeTime

Legendary Member
Pro Member
Pro Member
Followers
40
Following
6
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Posts
3,325
Likes Received
3,128
Trophy Points
313
Name
Chris
Country
United States
City/State
Pembroke Pines/FL
An interesting tidbit in Sony Alpha Rumors recent video says Viltrox is working on a "front teleconverter"
1.4x and wide angle converter 0.8x to be released next year.

I know there are macro converters that mount to the front of the lens, but will this design for a universal teleconverter work as advertised?
 
I can imagine that these would be far more expensive than the diopters for the macro stuff. Probably the reason why nobody has made one of these before is because the majority of people that want teleconverters want them for long lenses which typically don't have the same size front elements, meaning limited usability for the buyer.
 
I can imagine that these would be far more expensive than the diopters for the macro stuff. Probably the reason why nobody has made one of these before is because the majority of people that want teleconverters want them for long lenses which typically don't have the same size front elements, meaning limited usability for the buyer.
yeah it struck me as odd too. I guess if they make it 67mm or 72mm, it might work for a majority of lenses, but some might need a step up/down ring to adapt it... in which case would it work as intended? I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
 

* Please Consider Becoming a Site Supporter To Remove These Ads *

yeah it struck me as odd too. I guess if they make it 67mm or 72mm, it might work for a majority of lenses, but some might need a step up/down ring to adapt it... in which case would it work as intended? I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
My thinking, too. Can you imagine one in 95mm (200-600), for example?

Also, if it's at the front, it can't communicate with the camera body (a /tc at the back can "filter" communication with the body). I don't know if that will confuse the body, or simply mess up the EXIF metadata,
 
I'm still curious. I would love to stick that on the end of my 50-300 instead of saving up for a new lens... because I'm cheap 😅
 
That ^ does not look like a 'front' teleconverter. It looks like a Sony [behind-the-lens] teleconverter. So I wonder if it will have similarly limited applications.
 
It certainly does look look like a "real" teleconverter (I wonder if it's a fake image generated from a photo of a Sony?).

It's complete with a protruding piece, which means it would only work with lenses that have room for it. So it won't work with the 50-150 or 135 GM. (presuming it really looks like that, instead of being an AI generated fantasy).

But because it's at the back it can intercept all the communications between the lens and the body. Means it could be quite smart, but also means Viltrox would have to have reverse-engineered all of the Sony protocols.
 
The Sony TC has ten electrical contacts, the Viltrox only has four! It must therefore have significant disadvantages.
 
It certainly does look look like a "real" teleconverter (I wonder if it's a fake image generated from a photo of a Sony?).

It's complete with a protruding piece, which means it would only work with lenses that have room for it. So it won't work with the 50-150 or 135 GM. (presuming it really looks like that, instead of being an AI generated fantasy).

But because it's at the back it can intercept all the communications between the lens and the body. Means it could be quite smart, but also means Viltrox would have to have reverse-engineered all of the Sony protocols.
Yes, I wonder if its an AI image using the Sony model as a source. As you said, that protrusion would severely limit the lens compatibility. in which case, why even bother?
 

New in Marketplace

Back
Top