Some recent shots with a9 200-600 and some with 1.4 tc

[spudhead]

As title

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/11
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 8000

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/14
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 10000

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/14
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 10000

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/9
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 6400

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G)
• 600.0 mm
• ƒ/8
• 1/1600 sec
• ISO 640

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/11
• 1/1600 sec
• ISO 2000

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/16
• 1/3200 sec
• ISO 8000

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600 mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) + 1.4X Teleconverter (SEL14TC)
• 840.0 mm
• ƒ/11
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 8000

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G)
• 600.0 mm
• ƒ/7.1
• 1/1600 sec
• ISO 1600

• ILCE-9
• Sony FE 200–600mm F5.6–6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G)
• 459.0 mm
• ƒ/6.3
• 1/2000 sec
• ISO 1000

 

[Unframed Dave]

Nice and sharp with that TC.

 

[spudhead]

Nice and sharp with that TC.

Thanks I have had the tc for a couple of years and not really used it much so the last couple of weeks I have given it a work out and it seems ok in decent light even when some of the iso numbers are getting high

 

[Landshark99]

cool images, I think you may have pushed me into keeping my little used TC1.4, 70-200 and 200-600 and selling the 100-400,

 

[spudhead]

cool images, I think you may have pushed me into keeping my little used TC1.4, 70-200 and 200-600 and selling the 100-400,

As previous reply I have not used it much but think for sure on the 200-600 it works well even when the iso is quite , so far I have used it a couple of times on the 100-400 and noted some issues which I hope to work around

 

[iain clyne]

Aga a nice set of images, the first three are a great catch. For a spider to catch and keep a dragonfly is something. That lens works well with th tc and is so versatile.

 

[Brownie]

As titleView attachment 46264View attachment 46265View attachment 46266View attachment 46267View attachment 46268View attachment 46269View attachment 46270View attachment 46271View attachment 46273View attachment 46274

Spud shooting creepy crawlers? It’s a new world!

 

[spudhead]

Spud shooting creepy crawlers? It’s a new world!

They do not look so bad from 18 feet away which is pretty much where I am when using the 200-600 and 1.4 tc

 

[spudhead]

Aga a nice set of images, the first three are a great catch. For a spider to catch and keep a dragonfly is something. That lens works well with th tc and is so versatile.

Thanks Iain

 

[dragonsdreams]

As previous reply I have not used it much but think for sure on the 200-600 it works well even when the iso is quite , so far I have used it a couple of times on the 100-400 and noted some issues which I hope to work around

Yes, agreed - I like the 1.4x on the 200-600mm.
Never really liked my 100-400mm, it gathers dust until I have to go on a 'big wildlife' holiday (as in elephants) then the 200-600mm plus 1.4x is a bit OTT!

 

[Uncle Kevriano]

I sold my 1.4. Great when light is perfect, dreadful when it's not. That said, I was using it on the A7RIV, which shows every flaw due to the resolution, it was a very noticeable drop in IQ

 

[spudhead]

I sold my 1.4. Great when light is perfect, dreadful when it's not. That said, I was using it on the A7RIV, which shows every flaw due to the resolution, it was a very noticeable drop in IQ

yes Kev I have had differing results with the 100-400 and 1.4 tc it shows a fair bit of vignetting so far in testing at times, and yes the light needs to be good which is often not the case here in the UK