Have you picked up a Sony a7III recently? If so, then you might be thinking about which native full-frame E-mount (FE) lenses are also worth adding to your gear bag.
I’ve read and watched hundreds of full-frame E-mount lens reviews and I also own quite a collection myself. So I have a pretty good idea about which are the best lenses worth investing in and which should be avoided.

Sony a7III Forum & Facebook Group
If you are looking for further help and advice on the a7III or would simply like to share your photos, then please head over to our friendly Sony a7 Forum. If you prefer Facebook then I also run the Sony a7III Shooters Group.
Although this guide is aimed at owners of the Sony a7III, these lenses will work with all Sony E-Mount full-frame (a7, a7 ii a7R, a7R ii, a7R iii s7S, a7S ii a9) or APS-C (a6000, a6300, a6500) cameras.
Please note that this guide does not include every single E-mount lens, it’s just a selection of the most popular lenses based on use in the Alpha Shooters community. Visit my E-mount Lenses Guide for a complete list of lenses.
Contents
To help you decide on the best lens for your intended use, I’ve categorized the lenses into the following groups. Please note that there is a little duplication between the groups but this should hopefully make it much easier for you to find the lens that you are looking for. You can click any of the below links to jump to the type of lens that interests you the most.
- Top 10 Lenses
- Wide-Angle Lenses (12mm – 35mm)
- Zoom Lenses (24mm – 105mm)
- Portrait Lenses
- Macro Lenses
- Telephoto Lenses
- Street Photography Lenses
- Astrophotography Lenses
**Please Note: Unless otherwise mentioned no post processing has been applied to the image samples in this guide except for cropping. Full resolution SOOC JPEG images are available to download. RAW files are also available but password protected to help keep my hosting costs sensible. However, I do provide the username/password to all members of our community forum. All images are copyright protected and may be used for personal use only.
Sony a7III Top 10 Lenses
Here are my top 10 recommended lenses for the Sony a7III.
- Sony FE 12-24mm F2.8 G (SEL1224GM)
- Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM (SEL1635GM)
- Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM (SEL24F14GM)
- Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS (SEL24105G)
- Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD
- Sony FE 85mm F1.4 G Master (SEL85F14GM)
- Sony FE 85mm F1.8 (SEL85F18)
- Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS (SEL90M28G)
- Sony FE F4.5-5.6 100-400mm G Master (SEL100400GM)
- Sony FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS (SEL400F28GM)
Wide-Angle Lenses (12mm – 35mm)
A wide-angle lens generally refers to a lens that has 35mm focal length and wider on a full frame camera like the Sony a7III, with 24mm and wider lenses often being referred to as ultra-wide-angle lens.
Wide-angle lenses allow more of the scene to be included in the frame. Both wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle lenses are popular choices with landscape, architectural and interior photographers.
Here are some of the best wide-angle and ultra-wide-angle lenses from 12mm to 35mm for the Sony a7III and the Sony full-frame E-mount system of mirrorless cameras.
Sony FE 12-24 F2.8 GM (SEL1224GM)

The Sony FE 12-24 F2.8 GM has not long been announced. As soon as reliable information about this lens is available this section will be updated.
If you’d like to learn more about the Sony FE 12-24 lens then this early review from Sony Ambassador Mark Galer is worth watching:
You can also find additional early reviews in my Sony 12-24 F2.8 GM announcement post.
Pros:
Cons:
Recommended Reviews:
Sample Photos: Sony Sample Gallery
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Angle of View (35mm): 122°–84°
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: No filter thread available.
Length: 137 mm
Diameter: 97.6 mm
Weight: 847 g (29.9 oz)
Sony FE 12-24mm F4 G (SEL1224G)

The 12-24mm lens is an excellent ultra-wide-angle lens and the widest that Sony currently offers. It focuses and zooms internally so doesn’t grow in size and the autofocus is extremely fast.
Build quality is excellent and it weighs just 565 g, which is 47 g more than the popular Sony 16-35 f/4 FE lens. The lens has very impressive corner sharpness even when wide-open at f/4, there’s minimal distortion and almost no COMA for night photography. However with a widest aperture of f/4 the 16-35 F2.8 GM lens or the 24mm F1.4 GM lens are more likely to be the first choice for astro shooters.
Unfortunately like many ultra-wide lenses, the Sony 12-24 has a bulbous glass front element, meaning that it protrudes from the front of the lens. This makes it difficult to attach filters and there is no filter thread. However, thankfully there are now several companies making filter holders for this lens.
The 12-24 Sony lens is not a G-Master, but with the performance that is delivers it really should be. This is most definitely a lens that I would like to own myself.
Pros: Excellent central sharpness, low chromatic aberration, fast and accurate autofocus, great build quality
Cons: f/4 maximum aperture, high price, requires special filter holder
Recommended Reviews: Colby Brown
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Aperture Blades: 7 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: N/A. Requires Special 12-24 Filter Holder.
Length: 117.4 mm
Diameter: 87 mm
Weight: 565 g (1.25 lbs)
Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art

Unlike many of Sigma’s E-mount lenses that have been adapted from their SLR lenses, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art lens has been designed from the ground up for mirrorless cameras like the Sony a7III.
The build quality of this lens is excellent, remaining true to the high quality of Sigma’s Art series. The lens is weather sealed and features an integrated rear holder for gel filters, unfortunately there is no filter thread for conventional filters although NiSi do make an adapter (B&H Photo | Adorama).
At f/2.8 and 14mm both the center of the frame and corners are extremely sharp and remain sharp through f/11. At 24mm there’s again excellent central sharpness with the corners being just a little softer at f/2.8, but sharpening up by f/4.
There is a little barrel distortion and vignetting at 14mm and f/2.8 but this improves by f/5.6. Wide-open at 24mm there is some pin-cushion distortion, but for JPEG shooters if you have in-camera corrections turned on you’ll never notice this.
I’d recommend watching this review from Christopher Frost to learn more about this lens:
Pros: Great build quality, sharpness across the frame, low coma and vignette
Cons: No traditional filters
Recommended Reviews: Dustin Abbott | Dustin Abbott (YouTube)
Sample Photos: Sigma | Flickr
Lens Construction: 18 elements in 13 groups
Angle of View (35mm): 114.2-84.1°
Aperture Blades: 11 rounded
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Minimum Focusing Distance: 28cm / 11 in.
Maximum Magnification Ratio: 1:7.3
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: N/A (The lens comes with a rear filter holder for attaching sheet type rear filters)
Length: 131mm / 5.2 in.
Diameter: 85mm / 3.3 in.
Weight: 795g / 28.0oz.
Website: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN Art
ZEISS Batis 2.8/18

The Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 has very few competitors for the price. It’s a very lightweight lens that has been built to Zeiss’s very high standards and this really shows. Optically it’s an exceptional lens. There is a little distortion and vignette, but this is easy to correct in post. Extreme corners aren’t quite as sharp as the center but they are sharp enough.
The autofocus is fast and quiet and the lens is also weather sealed to help keep dust and moisture out. There is an infinite scroll focus ring for when you want to focus the lens manually, and also an innovative OLED display that shows the distance and depth of field to ensure the focusing range can always be perfectly set.
Coma performance is also very good even wide open at f/2.8. However vignetting is pretty heavy which may impact astro shots.
Pros: Great build quality, weather sealed, fast and quiet autofocus, excellent sharpness across the frame, chromatic aberrations well controlled
Cons: Moderate distortion, strong vignette at wide apertures, expensive
Recommended Reviews: Drew Robinson
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.25 m (0.82 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7 III)
Filter Thread Size: 77 mm
Length: 95 mm with lens cap, 80 mm without lens cap
Diameter: 100 mm
Weight: 330 g (0.74 lbs)
Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G (SEL20F18G)

The Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G is well built, compact and weighs only 373g (13.2oz). It’s weather sealed, has a customizable function button and a de-clickable aperture ring.
It features the same XD focus motor that can be found in much more expensive lenses like the Sony FE 400 F2.8 GM and 600 F4 GM, this focus motor is fast, reliable and very quiet which makes it a good choice for video work as well as stills.
Distortion is very well controlled even with in-camera corrections turned off. There is a little vignetting at f/1.8 but this is gone by f/2.8. Chromatic aberrations are well controlled as is flare.
The focus ring is silky smooth with a throw of around 160 degrees, however it does suffer from focus breathing most likely due to its very close focusing distance of just 0.59 ft / 0.18 m when focusing manually.
DPReview are calling this a “near-perfect lens”.
Here’s an excellent early review from Gerald Undone:
Pros: Size, sharpness, autofocus, distortion
Cons: Price
Recommended Reviews: Gerald Undone (YouTube) | Albert Dros (Sony Ambassador)
Sample Photos: DPReview
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.63 ft (AF), 0.59 ft (MF) (0.19 m [AF], 0.18 m [MF])
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 3-3/8 in (84.7mm)
Diameter: 3 in (73.5mm)
Weight: 13.2 oz (373 g)
Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM (SEL24F14GM)

By creating the Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM lens Sony has proven that you can build an excellent lens into a very small package. The lens is extremely well built, weather sealed against dust and moisture and weighs in at only 445 g.
On the lens itself you will find a focus hold button that can be customized, an AF on/off switch, an aperture selection ring and a click on/off switch for the aperture ring.

a7R III + 24mm F1.4 GM @ 1/200 | f/16 | ISO 320 | Shadows recovered in LR | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

a7R III + 24mm F1.4 GM @ 1/100 | f/1.4 | ISO 100 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
This lens is extremely sharp across the frame even when wide open at its maximum aperture of f/1.4. Distortion is well controlled as is the coma making this a great lens for astro photography.
The bokeh is silky smooth and possibly the best of all the current 24mm f/1.4 lenses available. Autofocus is fast, quiet and super accurate. I own this lens myself and absolutely love it. I’ll be writing a review for it just as soon as I get a little free time.
Pros: Very sharp across the frame wide open, beautiful bokeh, size & weight, aperture ring, fast autofocus
Cons: Strong vignetting wide open, flare resistance
Recommended Reviews: Phillip Reeve
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.24 m (0.79 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/16
Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 92.4 mm with lens cap
Diameter: 75.4 mm
Weight: 445 g (0.98 lbs)
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM (SEL1635GM)

If you are looking for the best possible wide-angle zoom lens then you don’t need to look any further than the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM. This certainly isn’t a lightweight lens though, as it weighs in at a hefty 680g.
Thankfully the build quality is excellent and it’s weather sealed against dust and moisture. The 11 circular aperture blades delivers ultra-smooth bokeh, focusing is fast and silent, and the sharpness is excellent across the frame. I own this lens myself and it very rarely leaves my gear bag.

a7R II + FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM @ 30sec | f/6.3 | ISO 400 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
Pros: Excellent sharpness across the frame, beautiful sunstars, very little coma and distortion, well controlled chromatic aberration
Cons: Weight, price
Recommended Reviews: Our Review
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 82 mm
Length: 121.6 mm
Diameter: 88.5 mm
Weight: 680 g (1.50 lbs)
Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS (SEL1635Z)

If the price of the Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM lens makes your eyes water, then the Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA lens is a little more budget friendly.
Although not quite as sharp as the GM lens and with a maximum aperture of only f/4, this Zeiss lens is still one of the most popular lenses for landscape photographers. Both smaller in size and lighter than the GM (it weighs only 518g), this is an excellent lens for when you are backpacking and every extra gram counts.
The images it produces have excellent color, contrast and impressive sharpness across the frame. Sadly the lens is not weather sealed like its larger GM brother, so you need to be a little more careful when the rain comes down. I also own this lens myself although it is collecting dust since I picked up the GM version.
Pros: Very good sharpness across the frame and zoom range, built in stabilization, well-built, fast and accurate autofocus
Cons: Flare resistance, not weather sealed
Recommended Reviews: Jordan Steele
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Aperture Blades: 7 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 72 mm
Length: 98.5 mm
Diameter: 78 mm
Weight: 518 g (1.14 lbs)
Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD (A046) Lens

After Tamron’s success with their 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD lens they now bring us a wider alternative in the Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD. Similar to the 28-75mm this lens offers great sharpness wide-open in a compact lightweight body and at a very reasonable price point.
Pros: Very good sharpness across the frame at 17mm and f/2.8, coma performance, flare resistance, size/weight
Cons: Color cast in the corners, distortion
Recommended Reviews: Phillip Reeve | Chris Turner (YouTube)
Sample Photos: FlickR
Lens Construction: 13 elements in 11 groups
Angle of View: 103°41′-75°23′
Aperture Blades: 9 rounded
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.19m (7.5 in) (WIDE) – 0.26m (10.2 in) (TELE)
Maximum Magnification Ratio: 1:5.2 (Wide) / 1:6 (Tele)
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: 67mm
Length: 99mm
Diameter: 73mm
Weight: 420g / 14.8 oz
Sony FE 35mm F1.8 (SEL35F18F) Lens

It took Sony quite some time to release this lens but it appears to have been worth the wait. This lens is small but well built and it ticks pretty much all of the boxes.
The autofocus motor is both fast and silent and the focus ring is very smooth. At f/1.8 it has good sharpness across the frame, this improves at f/2 and is excellent when you hit f/2.8.
Bokeh at short to medium distances is very pleasing and the lens displays minimal pin-cushion distortion. Unfortunately the lens is let down a little when it comes to vignetting, but this is the sacrifice made for squeezing this lens into such a small package.
If you would like to learn more about this lens then this review from Christopher Frost is definitely worth watching:
Pros: Sharpness, size and weight, bokeh
Cons: Vignetting, price
Recommended Reviews: Dustin Abbott | Philip Reeve | Ryan Mense (YouTube)
Sample Photos: Sony | Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.22 m (0.73 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: 55 mm
Length: 73 mm
Diameter: 65.6 mm
Weight: 280g (9.9 oz)
Zoom Lenses (24mm – 105mm)
Zoom lenses that cover a wider focal range can make great all-round lenses when you want to keep things light and simple and avoid carrying multiple lenses with you. Here are some of the best zoom lenses for the Sony a7III from 24mm up to 105mm.
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM (SEL2470GM)

The Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM is one of the very few zoom lenses that can keep up optically with many of the best prime lenses. It’s extremely well built, weather sealed from dust and moisture, and the autofocus is fast and accurate.
Sharpness is outstanding throughout the entire zoom range at all apertures and all focus distances, however the corners are a little softer when wide open. Whether shooting landscapes, events or any other type of shooting, this lens will handle pretty much everything that you can possibly throw at it.
Pros: Excellent center sharpness even when wide open, vignetting, build quality, fast and accurate autofocus, bokeh, chromatic aberration
Cons: Flare resistance, sharpness wide open, size, price
Recommended Reviews: Jordan Steele | Jannik Peters
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.38 m (1.24 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 82 mm
Length: 136 mm
Diameter: 87.6 mm
Weight: 886 g (1.95 lbs)
Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE ZA OSS (SEL2470Z)

If the Sony 24-70mm F2.8 GM is out of budget or simply far too large and heavy for your style of photography, then the Sony 24-70mm F4 Vario-Tessar T* FE ZA OSS lens may be what you are looking for. The lens is very well built and weighs in at only 426 g which is half the weight of the GM version!

a7R II + FE 24-70mm F4 @ 60mm | 1/40 | f/16 | ISO 100 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG
This is one of the Sony lenses that receives mixed reviews. Some people love it whilst others don’t rate is so favorably. I own this lens myself and although it’s certainly not as sharp as the GM version, the images it produces are sharp enough unless you really enjoy a good pixel peeping session.
However, I am very tempted to sell it so that I can afford the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD lens. So my recommendation would be to buy the Tamron if you don’t want to spend the money on the GM 24-70 lens.
Pros: Vignetting, chromatic aberrations and distortion are all well-controlled
Cons: Corners are soft at 24mm and 70mm
Recommended Reviews: Nomadic Pursuits
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.4 m (1.32 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Aperture Blades: 7 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 94.5 mm
Diameter: 73 mm
Weight: 426 g (0.94 lbs)
Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS (SEL24105G)

The Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS lens is an extremely versatile lens that covers a very useful focus area. This is one of the best if not the best 24-105 zoom lens on the market today.
The lens is sharp from 24mm all the way up to 105mm even when you are shooting wide open at f/4. If you like MTF charts then Roger Cicala has some over at LensRentals.com. Sony has really gone to town on this lens and it certainly shows. I don’t own this lens myself, but if I had money to burn I would certainly pick one up.
Pros: Covers a useful focal range with excellent sharpness across the frame, chromatic aberrations and flare well controlled, quiet and fast autofocus
Cons: Expensive
Recommended Reviews: Dustin Abbott | Lens Rentals
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.38 m (1.25 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 77mm
Length: 113.3 mm
Diameter: 83.4 mm
Weight: 663 g (1.46 lbs)
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD

When Tamron launched their 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD for Sony E-mount they really hit a home run. This lens has been sold out everywhere since launch and it’s really not surprising since it offers excellent sharpness and autofocus performance in a compact and lightweight body.
There is very little in the way of chromatic aberrations to worry about and the lens is sharp across the frame even when wide open at f/2.8.
The image quality of this lens is incredibly close to the Sony FE 24-70 F2.8 G Master lens, which is mind blowing considering the G Master costs double the price! This is Tamron’s first native lens for Sony E-mount and I most definitely hope that it’s the first of many. I don’t own this lens but would certainly like to.
Pros: Excellent sharpness even wide open, lovely sunstars, smooth bokeh, lightweight, cost
Cons: Distortion, vignetting
Recommended Reviews: Albert Dros | Jannik Peters
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.19 m (0.62 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 117.8 mm
Diameter: 73 mm
Weight: 550 g (1.21 lbs)
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art

Till now many of Sigma’s E-mount lenses have been adapted from their SLR lenses.
Thankfully the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art lens has been designed specifically for mirrorless cameras like the Sony Alpha Series
Sigma really hasn’t made too many sacrifices with this lens despite is costing around half the price of the equivalent Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM lens.
This lens is extremely well built, weather sealed, very sharp across the frame and the autofocus motor is both fast and quiet.
Flare resistance is a little disappointing as is the distortion when shooting at 24mm.
Unlike the Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM lens the Sigma does not include stabilization built into the lens itself, so it relies on your cameras in-body stabilization.
For a comparison with the Sony 24-70 F2.8 GM lens and the Tamron 28-75 F2.8 see this video from Gerald Undone.
Pros: Built quality, weather sealing, very sharp, quiet autofocus, price
Cons: Flare resistance, distortion at 24mm
Recommended Reviews: Dustin Abbott | Christopher Frost (YouTube) |
Sample Photos: Sigma
Lens Construction: 19 elements in 15 groups
Angle of View (35mm): 84.1° – 34.3°
Aperture Blades: 11 rounded
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Minimum Focusing Distance: 18-38cm
Maximum Magnification Ratio: Wide 1:2.9 – Tele 1:4.5
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: 82mm
Length: 124.9mm / 4.9in.
Diameter: 87.8mm / 4.9in.
Weight: 830g / 29.0oz.
Website: Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art
Portrait Lenses
Portrait lenses are often very subjective, as you can more or less use any lens that you like to shoot portraits with. Ultimately the decision is likely to come down to your own personal style of photography.
That said, although you can certainly shoot great portraits with a zoom lens, prime lenses are often the preferred choice since they will have a wider maximum aperture which is great for isolating your subject and producing a lovely creamy bokeh. Prime lenses are normally sharper than zoom lenses too and also a lot lighter making handling them a lot more enjoyable.
Here are some of the best portrait lenses for the Sony a7III and the Sony full-frame E-mount system of mirrorless cameras.
Sony FE 85mm F1.4 G Master (SEL85F14GM)

The Sony FE 85mm F1.4 G Master is an exceptional lens and one which every portrait photographer should own if they don’t already. Sharpness across the frame is already excellent from f/1.4, flare resistance is very good, as is control of chromatic aberration.
The build quality is as good as it gets for a Sony lens and it is weather sealed against dust and moisture. It is really only the autofocus performance that lets this lens down a little, as it’s most definitely not the fastest. However, eye auto focus works well and unless your subject is moving very fast you shouldn’t have any issues with nailing razor sharp images.
To make this lens a reality Sony first had to spend 3-4 years building their own mold-making machine that would allow the creation of a lens that didn’t have the previously-characteristic ridges present that can lead to unsightly onion-ring bokeh balls. Well, Sony certainly nailed their mold as this lens has the smoothest and creamiest bokeh of any lens on the market today.
I don’t own this lens myself but would most definitely be purchasing one if I was a portrait photographer.
Pros: Sharpness across the frame, bokeh, flare resistance, build quality
Cons: Sunstars, slow autofocus
Recommended Reviews: Bastian Kratzke
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.8 m (2.62 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/16
Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 77 mm
Length: 107.5 mm
Diameter: 89.5 mm
Weight: 820 g (1.80 lbs)
Sony FE 85mm F1.8 (SEL85F18)

If the 85mm G Master is out of budget then you might want to look at the Sony FE 85mm F1.8 lens. This lens is not as large, heavy or as ridiculously sharp as its larger G Master brother, but it certainly does not disappoint.
What is surpizing about this lens is that the autofocus is actually faster than the GM version. The bokeh isn’t quite as smooth as the GM, but it certainly comes very close. I own this lens myself and certainly have no plans to sell it anytime soon.

a7R III + FE 85mm F1.8 @ 1/200 | f/4 | ISO 100 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

a7R III + FE 85mm F1.8 | @ 1/400 | f/1.8 | ISO 100 | Cropped | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

This lens is also perfect for pet portraits. Here’s a shot of my dog Frank at 9 weeks of age.
Sony FE 85mm F1.8 (Shot on a7III) @ 85mm | 1/1000 | f/1.8 | ISO 250 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
If you can’t decide between the FE 85mm F1.8 and the FE 85mm F1.4 GM, then I recommend checking out this comparison video by Manny Ortiz.
Pros: Build quality, sharpness, bokeh, distortion, price
Cons: Purple fringing at large apertures, flare resistance
Recommended Reviews: Jannik Peters
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.8 m (2.63 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 82 mm
Diameter: 78 mm
Weight: 371 g (0.82 lbs)
Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS (SEL90M28G)

Despite being called a macro lens, the Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS lens is also an excellent portrait lens and one of the sharpest lenses that Sony has ever built. DxOMark reviewed this lens and said that its outstanding, scoring higher marks than both the Canon and Nikon equivalents.
It is very hard to find fault with this lens but if I’m being very picky then AF performance could be faster and the manual focus ring adjustments could be finer for more precision, but for shooting portraits you probably won’t care too much about manual focusing. This lens also has optical stabilization built in.
For shooting portraits this lens is ridiculously sharp. So if you don’t want to show every spot, blemish and wrinkle on your model this lens probably shouldn’t be your first choice for portrait work.
If you are looking for a dedicated macro lens, or a lens that can combine both macro and portrait photography roles, then look no further than the 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS lens. I own this lens myself and love using it for macro work and the odd portrait.

a7III + 90mm F2.8 G Macro @ 1/1600 | f/2.8 | ISO 160 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

a7III + 90mm F2.8 G Macro @ 1/1600 | f/2.8 | ISO 250 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
Pros: Incredible sharpness at all apertures, excellent color rendition, CA is well controlled, very well built, price
Cons: Autofocus isn’t the fastest, manual focus could allow for finer adjustments
Recommended Reviews: Miguel Quiles (YouTube) | Jordan Steele | DxOMark | Michael Comeau
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 62 mm
Length: 130.5 mm
Diameter: 79 mm
Weight: 602g (1.33 lbs)
Sony FE 100mm F2.8 STF GM OSS (SEL100F28GM)

The Sony FE 100mm F2.8 STF GM OSS lens is a very unique lens in the Sony FE lenses line-up since it includes a built in apodization (APD) filter. This is a clear glass filter that progressively darkens similar to a neutral density filter as you get further away from the center of the lens.
The effect of the ADP filter is at its greatest when wide open at F2.8 (T.5.6). As well as limiting the light coming in, the filter also makes bokeh balls darker towards their outer edge as well as softens it. While the aperture is stated as F2.8, the depth of field is similar to an F4 lens.
The build quality like with all GM lenses is excellent, as is the sharpness and lovely smooth bokeh. It really is a lens with its own unique style, and for exactly this reason there are many portrait photographers who love shooting with this lens.
Pros: Excellent sharpness, bokeh, build quality, image stabilization
Cons: Weight, poor light transmission, size
Recommended Reviews: Rose and Charles | Stephen Ozcomert
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.85 m (2.79 ft) at “0.85m-∞” position; 0.57 m (1.87 ft) at “0.57m-1.0m” position
Minimum Aperture: f/20 (T22)
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8 (T5.6)
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 72 mm
Length: 118.1 mm
Diameter: 85.2 mm
Weight: 700g (1.54 lbs)
Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens

The Sigma 105mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Lens for Sony full-frame E-mount is an exceptionally sharp lens even when shooting wide-open at f/1.4. Autofocus works almost as fast as Sony native lenses in good lighting, but in poor light autofocus starts to struggle a little more. There is very little in the way of vignetting and almost nonexistent chromatic aberrations.
However, despite its positives you can’t really overlook the fact that this lens weighs a massive 1645g and will make your a7III look tiny, but once you see the images that this bokeh beast is capable of creating you’ll soon forget about the size and weight issue. If I had money to burn I would certainly add this lens to my gear bag despite not shooting many portraits myself.
Pros: Exceptionally sharp wide-open, build quality, CA control, creamy bokeh
Cons: Large and heavy, filter size, autofocus speed
Recommended Reviews: Manny Ortiz (YouTube)
Sample Photos: Flickr
Lens Construction: 17 elements in 12 groups
Minimum Focusing Distance: 100cm (39.4 in)
Minimum Aperture: f/16
Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
Aperture Blades: 9 rounded
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 105 mm
Length: 131.5 mm
Diameter: 115 mm
Weight: 1645g (3.62 lbs)
Sony FE 135mm F1.8 GM (SEL135F18GM) Lens

Roger Cicala from LensRentals.com tested the Sony FE 135mm F1.8 GM lens and said: “This is the sharpest lens we’ve tested. Period. (At last count, that’s out of 300+ lenses tested.)
Roger isn’t the only person to praise this lens, many reviewers are saying that this is the sharpest lens that they have ever laid hands on.
Thankfully it’s not only sharpness where this lens shines, it also displays minimum chromatic aberrations, very low distortion and vignetting.
The autofocus motors are also extremely fast making this lens a great choice for sports and action photographers as well as portrait shooters.
I’d recommend watching this video from David Oastler to learn more about this lens:
Pros: Excellent sharpness, bokeh, build quality
Cons: Price
Recommended Reviews: LensRentals.com | Manny Ortiz (YouTube) | Miguel Quiles (YouTube)
Sample Photos: DPReview
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.7 m (2.3 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No
Filter Thread Size: 82mm
Length: 127 mm (5 in.)
Diameter: 89.5 mm (3-5/8 in.)
Weight: 950 g (33.6 oz.)
Macro Lenses
Macro lenses are often used to take photos of things close up like bugs, food, or generally anything that you would like to blow up really big to see as much detail as possible. A macro lens should have the ability to focus from infinity to 1:1 magnification at the closest focusing distance, this means that the size of the image in real life is the same size as it is reproduced on the sensor of your camera.
When choosing a macro lens the two most important figures that you should be looking at are the magnification ration and the minimum focusing distance. Ideally you will want a magnification ration of 1:1, and the longer the minimum focusing distance or working distance the better since it allows you to put more working space between your lens and your subject.
You might think that a smaller minimum focusing distance would be better since it allows you to get closer to your subject. However, if you get too close your lens will block light from reaching your subject and may also cast a shadow on it, and if your subject is alive it may well fly away before you have chance to focus and hit the shutter button.
Here are some of the best macro lenses for the Sony a7III and the Sony full-frame E-mount system of mirrorless cameras:
Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS (SEL90M28G)

The Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS lens is one of the sharpest lenses that Sony has ever built. DxOMark reviewed this lens and said that its outstanding, scoring higher marks than both the Canon and Nikon equivalents.
It is very hard to find fault with this lens but if I’m being very picky then AF performance could be faster and the manual focus ring adjustments could be finer for more precision. That said, for macro work I’ll normally adjust the focus by moving the camera back and forth and whilst making use of focus peaking to let me know when the focus is where I’d like it to be. This lens also has optical stabilization built in, making it even easier to get tack sharp images with slower shutter speeds.
If you are looking for a dedicated macro lens, or a lens that can combine both macro and portrait photography roles, then look no further than the 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS lens. I own this lens myself and have no plans to let it go anytime soon.

Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro (Shot on a7R III) @ 1/500 | f/2.8 | ISO 320 | Cropped | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
Pros: Incredible sharpness at all apertures, excellent color rendition, CA is well controlled, very well built, price
Cons: Autofocus isn’t the fastest, manual focus could allow for finer adjustments
Recommended Reviews: Jordan Steele | DxOMark | Philip Reeve
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 62 mm
Length: 130.5 mm
Diameter: 79 mm
Weight: 602g (1.33 lbs)
Sigma 70mm F2.8 DG Macro Art

The Sigma 70mm F2.8 DG Macro lens for Sony E-mount (full-frame) is the first macro lens from Sigma that has been adapted to Sony E-mount. However, the word adapted here is very important since the E-mount version of this lens has been adapted from their Canon and Sigma versions that were originally designed for SLR cameras and not mirrorless.
The additional adapter that is built onto the back of the lens body for the E-mount does add extra weight and length to the lens over its SLR equivalents.
Still, despite this lens being adapted from their SLR versions, it is a beautiful lens that costs almost half the price of the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 G OSS macro lens. The images that it produces are razor sharp across the frame, chromatic aberration is well controlled as is distortion. The bokeh is silky smooth and the lens feels like all Sigma Art lenses do, extremely well built!

a7R III + Sigma 70mm F2.8 Macro @ 1/1000 | f/5.6 | ISO 500 | Cropped | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
Autofocus on this lens is not the fastest, you certainly won’t be nailing sharp images of any bugs in flight. However, for macro work I’m using this lens in manual mode 99% of the time so I’m not worried about AF performance.
The large focusing ring is extremely smooth and gives you a lot of precision when manually focusing, however this precision comes at a price, as the focus ring requires around 10 twists of the wrist to go from minimum to maximum distance.

a7III + Sigma 70mm F2.8 Macro @ 1/800 | f/4 | ISO 320 | Cropped | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
Unlike the Sony 90mm Macro, the Sigma does extend when you focus. However, it never extends further than the lens hood and has never been an issue for me personally.
As it’s a 70mm lens with a minimum focusing distance of 0.25m, you will need to get very close to your subject for 1:1 images, so there is always a risk of casting a shadow or scaring off your subject.
I own this lens myself and for the price you really can’t go wrong with it.
Pros: Extremely sharp, color rendition, chromatic aberration, build quality, price
Cons: Autofocus, manual focus ring
Recommended Reviews: My Review
Sample Photos: My Review
Maximum Magnification Ratio: 1:1
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.25m (0.82ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 49 mm
Length: 130 mm (min) 181 mm (max)
Diameter: 70.8 mm
Weight: 622 g (1.37 lbs) with lens hood
Voigtlander 110mm f2.5 Macro Apo-Lanthar Lens

The Voigtlander 110mm F2.5 Macro APO Lanthar is an incredibly sharp macro lens that offers the Sony FE 90mm F2.8 G Macro lens a good run for its money. With a comfortable working distance of 17cm and superb build quality, this lens is most definitely on my wish list.
It is manual focus only, but I don’t expect this will be an issue for many macro shooters who prefer to shoot manual anyway. You can also make full use of the focus peaking on the a7R III to help find tune your focus.
Wide-open at f/2.5 and the lens is already incredibly sharp both centrally and even towards the edges of the frame. Bokeh is very smooth and free from onion rings, although you will see some cat’s eyes which don’t really improve as you step-down. CA is extremely well controlled.
Pros: Excellent sharpness, build quality, CA control, bokeh
Cons: Vignetting, Cat-eye bokeh balls
Recommended Reviews: Phillip Reeve | Fred Miranda
Sample Photos: Flickr
Maximum Magnification Ratio: 1:1
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.17m (0.56ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.5
Aperture Blades: 10
Auto Focus: No
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7R III)
Filter Thread Size: 58 mm
Length: 99.7 mm
Diameter: 78.4 mm
Weight: 763 g (1.68 lbs)
Telephoto Lenses
Telephoto lenses are typically the hallmark of sports and wildlife photographers. Sports photographers will often work with lenses up to 400mm and sometimes even longer, whereas wildlife photographers prefer the longest glass possible depending on what they are shooting.
Here are some of the best telephoto lenses for the Sony a7III and the Sony full-frame E-mount system of mirrorless cameras:
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS (SEL70200GM)

The Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS lens has a maximum focus range of 200mm, so your subject will need to be reasonably close if you want them to fill the frame. However, with a constant wide-open aperture of f/2.8, this is a great lens to use in low light situations or when you want the smoothest bokeh.
The lens is sharp across the frame even when wide-open at f/2.8. It’s well built and despite its heavy weight (1480g) it handles well on the Sony a7iii body. The autofocus is extremely fast and it will rarely miss the shot.

Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM (Shot on a9) @ 200mm | 1/1000 | f/2.8 | ISO 100 | Cropped | Exposure Correction in LR | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM (Shot on a9) @ 200mm | 1/1600 | f/2.8 | ISO 500 | Cropped | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
This lens is also compatible with the Sony FE 1.4x and 2.0x teleconverters helping to extend its reach up to 280mm with the 1.4x and up to 400mm with the 2x.

Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM (Shot on a9) @ 165mm | 1/2000 | f/2.8 | ISO 200 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG
I own this lens myself and often reach for it when shooting not only wildlife at a close distance, but also motocross, equestrian events, rally and pet portraits.
Pros: Very sharp, excellent color rendition, extremely fast autofocus, creamy bokeh
Cons: Expensive, heavy
Recommended Reviews: Nick Smyth (Youtube) | DxOMark
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.96 m (3.15 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 77 mm
Length: 200 mm
Diameter: 88.0 mm
Weight: 1480 g (3.26 lbs) without tripod mount
Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS (SEL70200G)

If the GM version or the 70-200mm is a little too expensive then you should definitely consider its baby brother the f/4 G version. With a constant aperture of f/4, you will still get some very pleasing bokeh and a lens that works well in low light situations.
This lens is not only crazy sharp across the frame, but it’s also extremely well built and delivers beautiful images in a very lightweight package.

It had no trouble nailing this shot of my dog Frank on his first trip to the beach at 12 weeks of age.
Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G (Shot on a7III) @ 113mm | 1/1600 | f/4 | ISO 500 | Cropped | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

Sony FE 70-200mm F4 (Shot on a6400) @ 200mm | 1/200 | f/4 | ISO 320 | Cropped | Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW **
The lens has optical stabilization built in and also a mode 1/2 switch for panning shots. Autofocus is almost as fast as the GM version so you will have no trouble nailing tack sharp action shots.
I own this lens myself as well as the GM version, and will often take the f/4 version with me when I want to travel as light as possible.
Pros: Build quality, sharpness, bokeh, weight, price
Cons: A little corner softness wide-open, vignetting
Recommended Reviews: Phillip Reeve | Matt Granger
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 1 m (3.28 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/4
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 72 mm
Length: 175 mm
Diameter: 80 mm
Weight: 840 g (3.26 lbs) without tripod mount
Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 Di III VXD

The Tamron 70-180mm f2. 8 Di III VXD has not long been released.
I have purchased it myself so will be adding my own views here shortly.
In the meantime for a closer look at this lens the following review from Dan Watson is worth watching:

Here’s a sample image of Frank for now.
Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 (Shot on a7III) @ 154mm | 1/4000 | f/2.8 | ISO 250 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW
Pros:
Cons:
Recommended Reviews: Dan Watson (Youtube) | Camera Labs
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 9
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.85m (Full zoom range) MF: 0.27m (WIDE), 0.85m (TELE)
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (Can use IBIS in camera)
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 149 mm
Diameter: 81 mm
Weight: 810 g (28.57 oz.)
Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS (SEL70300G)

If you want a little extra reach then the Sony FE 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G OSS lens is one of the lenses that you might want to consider. This is a variable aperture lens which goes from F4.5-F5.6 and the lens body also extends when you zoom. Autofocus is very quick and it produces very sharp images in the center of the frame wide open, however corner softness could be better especially when wide-open.

Sony FE 70-300mm (Shot on a6400) @ 300mm | 1/1000 | f/5.6 | ISO 500 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

Sony FE 70-300mm (Shot on a6400) @ 300mm | 1/1000 | f/5.6 | ISO 1250 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW

Sony FE 70-300mm (Shot on a6400) @ 210mm | 1/1250 | f/5.6 | ISO 100 | ** Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW **

Sony FE 70-300mm (Shot on a6500) @ 196mm | 1/250 | f/5.6 | ISO 160 | Cropped (I don’t provide full res images for superbike shots I’m afraid)
Build quality is very good and unlike both of the 70-200mm lenses this lens does not feature the white coating so it is much less discrete if you care about this. At 854g this lens weighs just a few grams more than the 70-200mm F4 lens which features a tripod collar, sadly the 70-300mm has no tripod collar which I find to be a very odd omission.
I own this lens myself and have enjoyed shooting a range of wildlife and motorsports with it. However, since picking up the FE 100-400 GM this lens is just collecting dust and I will probably be selling it just as soon as I have written a review.
Pros: Center sharpness, fast autofocus, build quality
Cons: No tripod collar, corner softness wide-open
Recommended Reviews: John Sison (YouTube) | Imaging Resource
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.9 m (2.96 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22-29
Maximum Aperture: f/4.5-5.6
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 72 mm
Length: 143.5 mm
Diameter: 84 mm
Weight: 854 g (1.88 lbs)
Sony FE F4.5-5.6 100-400mm G Master (SEL100400GM)

If you are looking for the best native 100-400mm zoom lens for shooting wildlife (my Borneo adventure), sports and action, then look no further than the Sony FE 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 GM OSS lens. I’ve owned this lens since it was released and it has rarely been off my camera since.

a6500 + 100-400 GM @ 345mm | 1/250 | f/5.6 | ISO 400 (I don’t provide full res images for superbike shots I’m afraid)
The lens has a variable aperture of F4.5-5.6, an extremely fast and silent autofocus motor, and the build quality would make some Ferrari’s blush. The lens is also weather sealed against dust and moisture so you won’t need to pull out your plastic bag when the rain comes down.

a9 + 100-400 GM @ 400mm | 1/1600 | f/5.6 | ISO 200 | Cropped | *Full Resolution Download: JPEG | RAW

Sony a6400 + 100-400mm GM @ 400mm | 1/1250 | f/5.6 | ISO 800 | Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG
Sharpness across the frame needs to be seen to be believed and DxOMark rate this as the sharpest lens in the 100-400mm focal range.
The lens is also compatible with the Sony FE 1.4x and 2.0x teleconverters, helping to extend its reach up to 560mm with the 1.4x and up to 800mm with the 2x. However, I’d recommend only using it with the 1.4x since with the 2x your aperture is pushed to f/11 which slows the AF speed and you’ll also find that the images produced are a little on the soft side.
If you can afford this lens then please don’t waste your time considering any other alternatives as you will not be disappointed with it, I certainly haven’t been.
Pros: Fast autofocus, very sharp across the frame, color rendition, bokeh, build quality
Cons: Price
Recommended Reviews: My Review | DxOMark
Sample Photos: My Review Samples
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.98 m (3.22 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/32-40
Maximum Aperture: f/4.5-5.6
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 77 mm
Length: 205 mm
Diameter: 93.9 mm
Weight: 1395 g (3.1 lbs) without tripod mount
Sony FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS (SEL200600G) Lens

The Sony FE 200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G OSS lens has not been out for very long but it’s already proving itself to be an exceptional telephoto lens for wildlife photographers.
Since I enjoy shooting wildlife myself I ordered this lens as soon as it was announced and I’m currently working on a 200-600 vs 100-400 comparison.
With a focal range of 200-600mm and a maximum aperture of f/6.3 at 600mm this lens will help you to get closer to wildlife than ever before. If 600mm is not long enough then you can also add the 1.4x or 2.0x teleconverters.
This is a big lens and it weighs 2115g without tripod mount and is 318mm in length. It’s also an internal focusing lens and the short zoom throw makes going from 200mm to 600mm a breeze. Because it doesn’t extend it also balances very well on a gimbal.
At 600mm this lens is sharper than the Sony FE 100-400 + 1.4x is at 560mm. At 400mm this lens is also a touch sharper than the 100-400 which considering it’s a G lens and not a GM lens is really quite something.
Since owning the 200-600 my 100-400 is starting to collect dust and as much as I’d like to keep both I will most likely be selling the 100-400 soon.

Sony a7 III + 200-600 @ 600mm | 1/1000 | f/6.3 | ISO 640 | Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW **

Sony a7III + 200-600 @ 600mm | 1/2000 | f/6.3 | ISO 640 | Cropped | Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG

Sony a7III + 200-600 @ 600mm | 1/2000 | f/6.3 | ISO 800 | Cropped | Full Resolution SOOC Download: JPEG | RAW **
Pros: Internal zoom, sharpness, 1.4x & 2.0x teleconverter compatibility
Cons: Size, weight
Recommended Reviews: Mark Smith (YouTube)
Sample Photos: My Sample Gallery
Minimum Focusing Distance: 2.4m (7.88 ft)
Minimum Aperture: 32-36
Maximum Aperture: 5.6-6.3
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 95mm
Length: 318 mm (12 5/8 in.)
Diameter: 111.5 mm (4 1/2 in.)
Weight: 2115g without tripod mount
Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS

The Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS has not long been released, as soon as reliable information is known about this lens this section will be updated.
I have purchased this lens myself and the image quality is very good and extremely close to the Sony FE 100-400 lens.
Unfortunately the autofocus performance is not on par with the Sony. It misses more shots and if you are shooting bursts with AF-C priority set to balanced emphasis it struggles sometimes to lock-on and fire the shutter.
I will be doing a full review and comparison with the Sony FE 100-400 GM lens very soon.
Until then this first look video from Gordon Laing is worth watching:
Pros:
Cons:
Recommended Reviews:
Sample Photos: Sigma Gallery
Lens Construction: 22 elements in 16 groups
Angle of View (35mm): 24.4° – 6.2°
Aperture Blades: 9 rounded
Minimum Aperture: f/22-29
Maximum Aperture: f/5
Minimum Focusing Distance: 112 (Wide) – 160cm (Tele) / 44.1 – 63in.
Maximum Magnification Ratio: 1:4.1 (400mm)
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 67mm
Length: 199.2mm / 7.8in.
Diameter: 86mm / 3.4in.
Weight: 1,140g / 40.2oz.
Website: Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS
Sony FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS (SEL400F28GM)

If money is not an issue then the Sony FE 400mm F2.8 GM OSS lens already has your name on it. This is the most expensive E-mount lens that you can currently buy and it is most definitely one of my dream lens.
I’ve not yet used this lens myself, but I know from Alpha Shooters who have that it is extremely sharp across the frame, has the fastest autofocus performance of any Sony lens, and weighs in at only 2895g which is very light for a 400mm f/2.8 lens and makes handling it on the Sony 7iii, a9 or whichever camera you decide to pair it with a dream.
The only real negative thing about this lens is the price. At $11,998.00 in the US or £10,499.00 in the UK, this lens will leave a very noticeable hole in your bank account.
Pros: Lightening fast autofocus, low light performance, sharpness, weight, handling
Cons: Very expensive
Recommended Reviews: Mark Galer (YouTube)
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 2.7 m (8.86 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 40.5 mm (slot-in)
Length: 359 mm
Diameter: 158.1 mm
Weight: 2895 g (6.38 lbs)
Sony FE 600mm F4 GM OSS (SEL600F40GM) Lens

The Sony FE 600mm F4 GM OSS lens is definitely at the top of my dream list but since it’s also Sony’s most expensive lens I’m going to be dreaming for quite some time!
The lens is extremely sharp across the frame and weighs in at only 3040g. The autofocus is as quick as it gets, if you miss focus with this lens it will definitely be user error!
The lens also supports Sony’s 1.4x and 2x teleconverters.
Pros: Extremely sharp, fast autofocus, weight
Cons: Cost
Recommended Reviews: Mark Smith (YouTube)
Sample Photos: DPReview
Minimum Focusing Distance: 4.5 m (14.8 ft)
Minimum Aperture: 22
Maximum Aperture: 4
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: Yes
Filter Thread Size: 40.5 (slot-in)
Length: 449 mm (17-3/4 in.)
Diameter: 163.6 mm (6-1/2 in.)
Weight: 3040 g (107.3 oz.)
Sony 1.4x Teleconverter Lens (SEL14TC)

The Sony 1.4x teleconverter (SEL14TC) is currently only compatible with the Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM, Sony 100-400mm GM, Sony FE 200-600 G, Sony FE 400mm F2.8 GM and Sony FE 600 F4 GM lenses. It will not physically fit any other Sony E-mount lenses.

a7R III + 100-400 GM + 1.4x @ 560mm | 1/200 | f/8 | ISO 800 | *Full Resolution Download: JPEG | RAW
The 1.4x will extend the reach of the 70-200mm GM lens to 280mm and the 100-400mm GM and 400mm GM lenses to 560mm on a full frame camera like the a7iii, but it will do so by sacrificing one stop of light. Fortunately this does not slow the autofocus speeds of these lenses, however you will notice increased vignetting in the corners wide-open and also a little more software in the images.
I own the 1.4x myself and use it often on my 70-200 GM, 100-400 GM and 200-600 G lenses.
Pros: Extends focal reach by 1.4x, autofocus speed, size and weight
Cons: Price
Recommended Reviews: Danny Eusebio (YouTube)
Sample Photos: Flickr
Length: 33.6 mm
Diameter: 62.4 mm
Weight: 167 g (0.37 lbs)
Sony 2x Teleconverter Lens (SEL20TC)

The Sony 2x teleconverter (SEL20TC) is currently only compatible with the Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM, Sony 100-400mm GM, Sony FE 200-600 G, Sony FE 400mm F2.8 GM and Sony FE 600 F4 GM lenses. It will not physically fit any other Sony E-mount lenses.
Pros: Extends focal reach by 2x, size and weight
Cons: Price
Recommended Reviews:
Sample Photos:
Length: 62.4 mm
Diameter: 42.7 mm
Weight: 207 g (0.46 lbs)
Street Lenses
There is a great deal of debate among photographers as to which is the best lens for street photography. Should I use a 35mm or 55mm for shooting in the streets? Opinions are divided and as with everything it often comes down to a matter of personal taste and the type of image that you want to create.
However, one thing that most street photographers will agree on is that wide-angle lenses below 35mm are generally more difficult to use for street. If you are shooting people with a lens under 35mm then you will literally need to be in their face to get the photo. That said, some street shooters like to use a 24mm to allow them to include more of the surrounding environment in their photo.
Here are some of the best street photography lenses for the Sony a7III and the Sony full-frame E-mount system of mirrorless cameras:
Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA (SEL35F28Z)

The Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA is a small beautiful lens that really excels at environmental portraiture and street photography. This 35mm f/2.8 lens is very sharp even when wide-open at f/2.8, bokeh is very pleasing and distortion is very well controlled.
However, due to its small size vignetting is a problem even when stopped down, so this will need to be corrected in post. If you are looking for a small, discrete lens for street photography, then this lens would be a very good choice.
Pros: Very sharp at f/2.8, bokeh, size and weight
Cons: Vignetting, price
Recommended Reviews: Brian Smith (YouTube) | Richard Wong
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.35 m (1.15 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 7 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 49 mm
Length: 36.5mm
Diameter: 61.5 mm
Weight: 120 g (0.26 lbs)
Sony Distagon T* FE 35mm F1.4 ZA (SEL35F14Z) Lens

The Sony Distagon T* FE 35mm F1.4 ZA is a big beautiful lens that really excels at environmental portraiture and street photography (if you don’t mind the size).
The 35mm f/1.4 is very sharp at f/1.4 and tack sharp to the corners when stopped down, while featuring the signature Zeiss color and contrast. There is a little distortion and some longitudinal CA and fringing, but these are easily fixed in post.
Pros: Very well built, lovely bokeh, very sharp wide open, CA well controlled, fast autofocus
Cons: large and heavy, expensive
Recommended Reviews: Steve Huff | Jordan Steele
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.3 m (0.98 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/16
Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7R III)
Filter Thread Size: 72 mm
Length: 112.0 mm
Diameter: 78.5 mm
Weight: 630 g (1.39 lbs)
Sony FE 55mm F1.8 ZA (SEL55F18Z)

The Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA lens is a very versatile lens that creates a different look versus a 24mm or 35mm because of its narrower field of view.
It’s an excellent lens for street photography providing you don’t mind its size. The lens is exceptionally sharp wide open and the bokeh is nice and smooth, but it does exhibit some onion rings as well as the cat-eye effect towards the edges of the frame.
Pros: Very sharp across the frame, excellent build quality, fast and silent autofocus
Cons: Vignetting, cat-eye bokeh balls and onion rings
Recommended Reviews: Rose and Charles | Phillip Reeve
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.5 m (1.64 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 49 mm
Length: 70.5 mm
Diameter: 64.4 mm
Weight: 281g (0.62 lbs)
Astrophotography Lenses
If you want to capture images of the sky at night then you will want a lens that works well for low light photography. Some of the most important characteristics of a good lens for astrophotography are a wide maximum aperture like f/1.4, but the lens should also be sharp at this wide-open aperture and offer decent corner resolution and coma correction. Low vignetting is important to, as is the ability to focus manually since autofocus is out of the question at night.
Wide-angle lenses make good choices for astrophotography because they have a larger field of view (FOV). This allows you to capture much more in one shot, such as the Milky Way and also some foreground interest. Also the wider the angle of your lens the longer you will be able to expose for before star trails become a concern.
Here are some of the best astrophotography lenses for the Sony a7III and the Sony full-frame E-mount system of mirrorless cameras:
* Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM (SEL24F14GM)

As you will have probably noticed that this lens has found its way into 3 different categories. It’s not only a great lens for landscape, interior, and environmental portrait photography, but with its wide-open aperture of f/1.4 it also excels at astrophotography.
Astrophotographer Alyn Wallace has described this lens has potentially the best lens ever made for astrophotography, which really is quite a statement. See the link to his review below.
The lens is extremely well built, weather sealed against dust and moisture and weighs in at only 445g. On the lens itself you will find a focus hold button that can be customized, an AF on/off switch, an aperture selection ring and a click on/off switch for the aperture ring.
This lens is extremely sharp across the frame even when wide open at its maximum aperture of f/1.4. Distortion is well controlled as is the coma making this a great lens for astro photography. The bokeh is silky smooth and possibly the best of all the current 24mm f/1.4 lenses available. Autofocus is fast, quiet and super accurate, not that this is so important for astro photographers. I own this lens myself and absolutely love it. I’ll be writing a review for it just as soon as I get a little free time.
Pros: Very sharp across the frame wide open, beautiful bokeh, size & weight, aperture ring, fast autofocus
Cons: Strong vignetting wide open, flare resistance
Recommended Reviews: Alyn Wallace (YouTube) | Gary Hart | Phillip Reeve
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.24 m (0.79 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/16
Maximum Aperture: f/1.4
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 67 mm
Length: 92.4 mm with lens cap
Diameter: 75.4 mm
Weight: 445 g (0.98 lbs)
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM (SEL1635GM)

The Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM with very little coma and distortion is a great lens for astrophotography. This certainly isn’t a lightweight lens though as it weighs in at a hefty 680g. Thankfully the build quality is excellent and it’s weather sealed against dust and moisture.
The 11 circular aperture blades delivers ultra-smooth bokeh, focusing is fast and silent, and the sharpness is excellent across the frame. I own this lens myself and it very rarely leaves my gear bag.
Pros: Excellent sharpness across the frame, beautiful sunstars, very little coma and distortion, well controlled chromatic aberration
Cons: Weight, price
Recommended Reviews: Our Review
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.28 m (0.92 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 11 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: 82 mm
Length: 121.6 mm
Diameter: 88.5 mm
Weight: 680 g (1.50 lbs)
Laowa 12mm 2.8 Zero-D

The Laowa 12mm 2.8 Zero-D lens for Sony E-mount is one of the widest prime lenses available that offers almost zero distortion. Unfortunately wide open the coma performance isn’t that great even when stopping down to f/5.6, so you will need to work on this a little in post. However, currently there is no other 12mm lens available for Sony E-mount with a maximum aperture f/2.8, which is why I’ve included it here.
Pros: Excellent sharpness wide-open, distortion, build quality
Cons: Coma
Recommended Reviews: Bastian Kratzke
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.18 m (0.59 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/22
Maximum Aperture: f/2.8
Aperture Blades: 7 circular
Auto Focus: No
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: N/A. Requires Laowa 100mm Filter Holder
Length: 83 mm
Diameter: 75 mm
Weight: 609 g (1.34 lbs)
Price Check & Buyer Reviews for Laowa 12mm 2.8 Zero-D
At: Amazon | B&H Photo | Venus Lens
Sigma 14mm 1.8 DG HSM Art

Without doubt, the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art is one of the best ultra-wide angle lenses ever made to this date. This lens has been available in both Canon, Nikon and Sigma mounts for some time, but now Sigma has adapted this lens for Sony E-mount. So you are basically getting an SLR designed lens with an adapter bolted on, this means that it does retain its considerable size and weight.
However, despite the rather crude form of adapting this lens to Sony E-mount, this can easily be forgiven since the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art produces exceptionally detailed images with very little distortion and chromatic aberration.
This lens does show signs of coma from f/1.8 to f/2.5 and you might even see traces of coma at f/2.8 if you have very bright stars at the edges of the frame. However, coma is still not as prominent as on many other wide-angle lenses, and also you are unlikely to have very bright stars at the edge of the frame, so I still think it’s a very good choice for astro shooters.
Pros: Extremely sharp, very well built
Cons: Size and weight, coma frame edges
Recommended Reviews: Alyn Wallace (Canon Mount) | DPReview (Nikon Mount)
Sample Photos: Flickr
Minimum Focusing Distance: 0.27 m (0.89 ft)
Minimum Aperture: f/16
Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
Aperture Blades: 9 circular
Auto Focus: Yes
Stabilization: No (But you can use IBIS on the a7III)
Filter Thread Size: N/A
Length: 126 mm
Diameter: 95.4 mm
Weight: 1170 g (2.57 lb)
Sony Lens Abbreviations
Sony does like to make use of abbreviations, so here’s a quick guide to their lens abbreviations so that you are not left scratching your head.
SEL – Sony autofocus lenses designed for the Sony E-mount mirrorless camera system.
FE – “Full-frame E-mount” lenses designed for 35mm full-frame cameras like the Sony a7III.
E – Lenses designed for Sony’s mirrorless cameras with APS-C sized sensors, like the Sony Alpha a6000, a6300, a6500.
G – “Gold” series, Sony’s line-up of high-grade lenses.
GM – “Gold Master” series, Sony’s line-up of ultra-high-grade lenses featuring the highest-quality materials.
ZA – ZA lenses are designed and manufactured by Sony in Japan, but only once the designs get approval by Carl Zeiss AG to meet their high quality standards.
OSS – Optical SteadyShot means that the lens has optical image stabilization built in to the lens body.
TC – Stands for Tele Converter and means that this particular lens is designed to increase the focal length (and reduce the maximum aperture) of a telephoto lenses.
STF – Smooth Transition Focus. Lenses that employ special APD lens groups that get thicker towards the edges and, because of that, reduce the amount of light passing through. These lenses are designed to deliver extremely smooth, silky out of focus bokeh.
Before You Go
Whichever lens you go for I’d recommend updating both the lens and camera to the latest firmware version, as new firmware releases often address compatibility issues and improve autofocus performance with some lenses.
Do you already own any of these lenses for your Sony a7III? If you do, I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments below. Or have I missed any lenses that you think should be included? Again, please do let me know in the comments below.
If you are on Facebook then I’d love for you to join one of the many Sony Alpha Shooters groups that I run. There are groups for Sony Alpha landscape, portrait, sports, wildlife, weddings, macro, street, and video shooters, as well as a generic group for everything else Alpha. You can find all of the links here. The groups are a great place to post your shots with your brand new lens!
Please also note that this guide does not include every single E-mount lens out there, just a selection of the best lenses based on reviews from Alpha Shooters around the globe as well as my own experience.
Hi Timothy,
I’m starting using a7iii and I like take sport pictures. I would like to hear your advice which lens best to take sport/action shot 100-400 or 200-600? I’ve been using 70-200 f/4 but sometimes the object is out of my range. What would you recommend for best (sharp, crisp) result? Also pls give me 2nd option. Thank you!
Hi Petty. If you take a look in our Sports Shooters Group on Facebook you’ll see people using both The Sony FE 100-400 and 200-600 for various sports. I guess it depends how close you can get to the action, will 400mm be enough or would 600mm be better for where you’d be shooting from? Also if you’ve taken a lot of photos closer to 100mm than 200mm then that probably rules out the 200-600. Both will deliver in the AF department. The 200-600 will start to weigh your arms down much sooner than the 100-400 if you shoot hand held. You could also consider the Sigma 100-400mm f5-6.3 DG DN lens for a much cheaper alternative, although the AF isn’t as fast as the native Sony lenses. There’s now also the Tamron 150-500mm F/5-6.7 Di III VC VXD to consider which has been getting good reviews, but it’s only a little cheaper than the Sony FE 200-600 and it doesn’t support teleconverters. I hope that helps a little!
Hello Timothy Mayo,
I truly enjoyed your refreshingly simplified and direct review opinions about lenses for Sony camera body users.
Photography has been the primary source of my income since 1970 including 35 years in a university classroom environment as a professor of art teaching photo— and over the last 6 decades I have owned and used a rather wide variety of photographic tools in a array of formats. Initially in the 1960s I shot telephoto images on 35mm film for the years in which I was a staff photographer with an California based international sports magazine— but since then I have long favored wide angle lenses for the bulk of my post 1970 career functioning primarily as a fine artist photographer. While I am truly drawn to, and tempted by, the IQ specifications of the “best of the best” lenses and camera bodies available, I rarely find it necessary to overspend for the type of images I create. (However I must admit that I did use legendary Leica equipment and Canon camera bodies solely with L glass during my pre-digital film years.) In 2004 when I transitioned to digital capture, I continued with Canon until the smaller body and lens sizes from the Sony line became viable and widely available. Currently I am delighted with the results I experience from utilizing an A7III in combination with a A7RIII— plus the tiny RX100MKVI for a “never leave home without” camera. Not to diminish the exceptional IQ of crop sensors I did produce many museum quality photographs with the NEX7 and A6000 series. I recently, but with strong reservations, parted with my A6500, and lenses, because that bag of equipment was gathering too much dust as compared to my A7 tools.
Perhaps I should clarify the primary underlying motivation for drafting this narrative— it is that when I read online opinions and reviews I am not always sure of the writers image making background or their real world qualifications and therefore I sometimes have reservations about the value of their opinions relative to my personal equipment upgrade interests— especially when I try to maintain a reasonable balance between a sane fiscal budget vs the lust of the dreaded gear acquisition syndrome.
As to my actual photographic needs nearly all of my work is printed at “modest” sizing on either 13″ x 19″ or 17″ x 22″ paper stock— and it must be “museum quality” as somewhat in excess of 1,450 of my photographs have been acquired by 219 museums and university museums in 45 states, Washington, DC, Australia, Canada, France, Great Britain, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Switzerland for their permanent collections of fine art. The fine art galleries that have represented my work have also required print standards equal to museum curatorial expectations.
Of the WA primes I currently favor which you did not mention I have had great success with the manual focus Voightlander 21mm f/3.5, the Sigma 24mm f/3.5, and the surprisingly compact Sony 28mm f/2. The ultra light weight Sony/Zeiss 35mm f/2 and/or the Sony 55mm f/1.8 are excellent companion lenses for a WA prime when I want a narrower field of view. On rare occasions when I do not want to switch lenses I employ the crop sensor mode on my A7RIII and the 18MP results are surprisingly good with all my prime lenses.
For the convenience category of lenses I originally purchased a Sony/Zeiss 24-70 f/4 but later replaced it with the Sony G 24-105 solely due to the rave reviews about this lens. Recently I forgave myself for my perceived lapse in judgement and repurchased the Sony/Zeiss 24-70 because it had served my purposes quite well previously— irrespective of the less than stellar online opinions, plus the lens was advertised at below the $700. mark. My “go to” WA zoom lens has always been the Sony/Zeiss 16-35 f/4. Probably 85% of my work folders containing preferred images were all produced within that range of focal lengths.
During my early years magazine staff sports photography adventures I owned and used high quality prime telephoto lenses only. They were 200, 300, 360, 400, and 600mm versions but now I only own the Sony 70-300 zoom and it serves me well when needed.
Thanks again for your clarity of information.
Very valuable information! Thankyou Robert!! Sounds like you have many many years of expertise in this area!!
Hi Timothy, I own a7mIII since 2 months and a 200-600mm, 90 mm macro, 50 mm 1.8 and a kit lens 28-70 mm .. was looking for a teleconverter and wanted to know if the 1.4x and 2X are compatible with a7mIII before I buy it… and also which all lenses above mentioned in my comment can I use these converters with.. and personally which one would you recommend as I m a beginner in wildlife and birding! Waiting for the reply!
Hi Kanchan. Both the 1.4x and 2x teleconverters are only supported with the 100-400 GM, 200-600 G, 70-200 GM, 400 F2.8 GM and 600 F4 GM lenses. I’d recommend the 1.4x with the 200-600 over the 2x which results in softer images and you also lose two stops of light instead of just one. All the best, Tim
Hi Timothy, Thank you for such a great article. This is really informative. I recently pre-ordered Sony A7c body only and I’m confused with which lense should I pick for my YouTube videos. I mostly do indoor shoots and travel videos. Initially I was planning for Sony16- 15mm F2.8, however I noticed that the lense is quite heavy for vlogging. I prefer a zoom lense with low aperture for night shoots. Question 2: I liked the Sony 24mm F1.4 prime lense, if incase I buy this lense, will this be enough for indoor shoots as well? if not, can you recommend a combination zoon lense for the Sony 24mm lense (Tamron)? I look forward to you response.
Congrats on the new a7C Rahul! I actually use the Sony FE 24mm F1.4 GM to record some of my indoor YouTube videos and it works great. It’s wide enough for my use but there’s also the FE 20mm F1.8 G if you wanted something a little wider. There’s a good comparison article between both lenses here: https://www.sonyalphalab.com/sony-fe-20mm-f-1-8-g-lens-vs-fe-24mm-f-1-4-gm-lens-lab-testing/
Hello Timothy, thanks for the post. I was wondering.. which could be a best first lenses for Sony Alpha 7 III ? I am looking for something to do street photography mainly.. I am wondering if the 50mm 1.8F could be the best choice ? or the 35mm 2.8 is better ?
Hi Martina, the 35 F2.8 is the better lens and will also allow you to capture a little more of the environment compared with the 50mm. It depends what type of street shots you are looking to capture?
What lens do you recommend for me i just jumping to the a7iii from my old d750 and want a lens for travel ( landscape ) and portrait photography
sorry for my grammar i just need an advice should i go with a two prime lenses 50mm and the 20mm or with a standard lens
Personally I’d goth with the Tamron 28-75 F2.8, or the Sigma 24-70 F2.8 if you don’t mind the extra weight and cost.
Hi Timothy,
I’m buying a Sony a7III and was wondering which lense would be the best for me. I’ll need a camera lense that can do indoor product photography and outdoor travel videos/vlogs. It’ll needs to have a nice bokeh so I can transition smoothly in between landscape and portrait. I’m attaching a gimbal so nothing too big or heavy as well where I would have trouble carrying in and out on the road. I was thinking a Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS (SEL24105G), but it’s so damn expensive. I really like the versatility of that lense and because it has such a wide range of zoom, it’s really perfect for dramatic travel videos. But, I’m not sure if I want to start out with an empty body and such a high level lense as my first sony FE lense. Do you have a better mid tier recommendation that might go with what I’m looking for? Or should I really just bite the bullet because nothing in the mid tier range will perform what I’m looking for? Either way, thanks for your blog, it’s really helpful!
Hi Ash. The Sony FE 24-105 F4 does get a lot of praise and would probably suit your needs very nicely but I know it’s not a cheap lens. Next option could be the Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG DN which is cheaper or the Tamron 28-70 F2.8 which is a little cheaper still. Hope that helps a little!
Hey! I know this is a tricky question, but what lens should I get if I’m starting out with Sony a7iii. I need a versatile and sharp lens to get started. I’m new to photography and I will mainly take portraits and food photography for online and print. Sometimes I will also take nature/landscape photos. What would you recommend that I get first? From what I understood the kit lens isn’t very good. I would like to get just one first, and after a few months add one more 🙂 thanks. All the best, Sarah.
Hi Sarah. Do you already have the kit lens? If so it’s an ok lens to get started with and you’ll soon find out where it’s holding you back. You might find that you want something wider or perhaps more reach. If I was buying just one lens and liked to take a mix of portraits, nature and landscapes then I’d probably go for the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD. It has a small minimum focussing distance so will also be handy for your food photography and shooting indoors with its f/2.8 max aperture. Alternatively the Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art is a very nice lens, a little sharper than the Tamron but it’s also larger, heavier and more expensive. However, the minimum focussing distance of the Sigma is almost double that of the Tamron, so you won’t be able to get quite as close for food shots. Hope that helps a little!
Hey Timothy. Thanks for getting back to me 🙂 No, I don’t already have the kit lens. I’m struggling to find out whether I should just get the kit, or buy the camera house+a better lens. So you’re saying that you would just get the kit lens and take it from there? I have a job that involves portraits and food photography in a few weeks, and I just want to make sure that I can deliver great photos for it. Thanks for suggesting the lenses from Tamron and Sigma, I will read a bit about them. I can see that the lens from Tamron has an ok price. Do you think it would be a good choice to drop the kit lens and go for the Tamron lens instead? All the best, Sarah.
Hi Sarah, if you don’t already have the kit lens then personally I’d probably just buy the a7III body only and then the Tamron 28-75. I don’t think you will be disappointed with this combination. Have a nice weekend! 🙂
Surprised I didn’t see the Samyang 85mm 1.4 FE mentioned…
Hey Dimi, thanks for pointing that omission out! I’ll take a closer look at the Samyang 85 and consider including it here. All the best, Tim
Do these lenses apply the same to video shotting or is there another list of telephotos and macro lenses for that?
Hi Maria. You can use all of these lenses for video shooting but some will be more suitable depending on what you are wanting to do. Although the a7III has stabilization built in the lenses which include OSS will offer better stabilization which is usually important for video unless you are using a gimbal. If you are wanting to use a gimbal however then either a prime lens or an internally focusing lens will balance better although you can still fix a zoom lens at a set focal range. Autofocus performance and a quiet af motor is also important. I know that the 55mm F1.8 ZA is a very popular video lens but it’s going to come down to what you want to achieve. You might find this video helpful: https://youtu.be/H7m9rpp-dYw